Reply to Option H is permanent and the old Wootton HS campus will be closed for good?

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Option H is permanent and the old Wootton HS campus will be closed for good?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think the main point needs to be that we DO NOT HAVE THE STUDENTS to justify two schools. We never did!

Crown was a gift so had to be built. IT only makes sense to use it and change the usage of Wootton until the time comes that the enrollment justifies another high school. [/quote]

No, it did not have to be built. I love how everyone thinks they know facts when they don’t. Go look up the deed. It says it can also be used as a public park. If a school truly isn’t needed, why waste millions build it. It could’ve been a great park for community use. [/quote]

Exactly. This is a stupid mistake that MCPS traps itself in. MCPS could have returned this gift back to Gaithersburg city without any cost. [/quote]

No, the City of Gaithersburg wanted a new high school.  Just like they made MCPS pay for an artificial turf field at their new elementary school and then took over the field for their own use.  The City of Gaithersburg wants bling. [/quote]

Wonderful. Give it to Gaithersburg. Leave Rockville and Potomac alone.[/quote]

This is only an issue because Wootton families are saying it’s unsafe.  Take responsibility for your actions.  [/quote]

1. Not all Wootton families are saying this. Most aren’t.
2. Also even if it was unsafe, who is responsible for the building’s condition? Parents or Mcps? Stop the gaslighting. You probably blame victims of violence. If only you didn’t piss off your abuser, you wouldn’t have been abused 
3. Assuming it is unsafe, you do realize H would use Wootton as a holding schools for other kids right…
4. So why is Wootton unsafe such that all Wootton kids have to leave and go to Crown yet safe enough for Damascus and Magruder 
5. Wait before you even say it—well we would renovate Wootton before it used for other kids—so this means the renovation money does exist AND H isn’t cheaper. Not to mention again…crown is literally more accessible for any high school that needs a holding school.

You should about as inept as MCPS lawyers. Maybe you should apply for a legal position with MCPS. They’ll need more lawyers anyways for the absolute onslaught of lawsuits coming their way if they are dumb enough to pick H.[/quote]

Your advocates are saying its unsafe.  Talk to them.

Many schools have the same issues.  Why do you think your school should be first in line?

You need a holding school to make the repairs or kids have to be shuffled to other schools.

You cannot renovate these buildings.  Once mold is there it has to be torn down to the studs and replaced.[/quote]

My friend, surely you see the issue with your flawless logic.
Damascus and Magruder need a holding school, along with many other schools in the county.
You just said Wootton can’t be renovated (your claim not mine).
So why use Wootton as a holding school? Why not use Crown?

Either Wootton is not unsafe and thus shouldn’t be forcibly evicted out, so no H

Or Wootton is unsafe and thus by your own logic cannot be used as a holding school due to mold that requires to be torn down. If that’s the case, also no H unless you think its ok for Damascus and Magruder kids and others to breath in mold??

So which one is it? Is Wootton safe or not safe? Never mind doesn’t matter, either way answer supports no H.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics