Reply to New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why can’t clubs have ECNL and MLSN? Or GA and ECNL? Do the leagues really care about getting entire clubs aligned with either ECNL or GA/MLSN? [/quote]

ECNL is the only league that forces both boys and girls top teams compete in ECNL.  [/quote]

no it doesn't. stop lying. there are plenty of teams that have MLS boys and ECNL girls and/or RL girls.    but with the merger, GA is starting to put pressure on those ECNL girls teams to move to GA since they have MLSnext.  soft pressure now but it will only grow [/quote]

Most of those girl ECNL teams with MLSN boys were there from the beginning of ECNL and are grandfathered in. NVA was trying to maintain ECNL girls when the boys went MLSN but the league said no. [/quote]
There is no "grandfathering" clause.

All MLSN clubs with girls ECNL will be GA in 1-3 years.[/quote]there is if you have legal paperwork ensuring lawyers can win that argument…. Looks at Bethesda [/quote]
So you're suggesting youth soccer clubs hire lawyers just to keep girls ECNL?

Think about what you've written, the market is moving a different direction. Clubs have 2 options get in front of the action or spend a bunch of money to maintain the status quo.

Which option do you think clubs will choos?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics