Reply to Boundary Review Meetings

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "Boundary Review Meetings"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Are they going to fix the island they made in graham road they added to timber lane? Would make more sense to swap that out for the kids already at timber lane that they made the island at Shrevewood for. That way more kids in need are staying at their current closer schools.[/quote]

That remains unclear.  I think one poster brought it up last night at the Madison/McLean meeting.  Reid had her team take a note but no particular change to Scenario 4 was identified.

As long as they are proposing to move more kids south of Route 29 to Timber Lane, they'll need to move some kids currently at Timber Lane north of Route 29 to Shrevewood.  Otherwise, Timber Lane would be grossly overcrowded.

They could just leave the Graham Road/Timber Lane boundaries alone, but that leaves Graham Road outside its attendance area, and it will upset the Falls Church families zoned for "new" Graham Road, which they now see as a big improvement.  But leaving Kingsley Commons kids in a new attendance island where they have to travel further to get to Timber Lane than they do to get to Graham Road now is a bad idea.  It's the exact type of situation they originally set out to correct.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics