Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Fairfax County Double Murder"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Who is Roy? [quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why did BB upgrade HIS phone and AP's phone as opposed to his phone and Christine's? Hmm[/quote] Seriously. I think we all know the answer to this question. Also worth noting that BB is very competent at tech/phones. He knows what needed to be wiped.[/quote] I'd imagine a lot of his criminal investigative training is re: electronic forensics. Agree. [/quote] Roy again: No. A new agent like bb was, wouldn’t have much specialized training in phone forensics. BB was a baby agent. [/quote] If you are so knowledgeable, how does paid leave work in such a situation when a service weapon has been fired and there is an ongoing criminal investigation? How long can it last for? What would trigger it ending? If he is not arrested for years, a la Mark Winger, what then? [/quote] Roy here. Truth is that non managerial agents don’t have any direct information. Here’s a similar example that I observed. Management became aware that an agent took actions that would reasonably cause them to be fired. Everyone gossiped about what they knew at the water cooler. The agent left the office and did not return. Some new agent was directed to take all of the offending agents personal effects to their home. That newbie agent picked up whatever government equipment the offending agent had in their possession. Management updates the agents that the offending agent was on a HQ detail. An investigation was conducted and the findings were sent to a disciplinary board. The disciplinary board met and made a determination. The determination was communicated to the agent. The agent likely separates from the government. The offending agent was a SOB so very few people stayed in contact. The ones that did stay in contact did not communicate the outcome with the rest of the field office. The timeline in the situation I observed from act to likely separation was about a year. Back to BB. My speculation is that BB has already separated from the govt. The IRS and TIGTA would be looking to have an incredibly in depth analysis of every detail of use of a gov firearm. If BB refused to cooperate with that inquiry may be cause for separation. [/quote][/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics