Reply to GA Case

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "GA Case"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Nathan also billed for 24 hours for a single day at $250.00 per hour on multiple occasions.[/quote]
I guess you missed it when this was brought up during the hearing. Wade was shown the document and given a chance to explain. He filled out a form to be paid where he named the task he performed, listed how many hours of work the task required and had to give a date for when the task was completed. He was submitting paperwork to be paid for 24 hours’ worth of work, but only a single date was listed because he was only asked for the date he completed the work. He did not bill for 24 hours’ worth of work all performed on the same date.[/quote]

Sounds like he is not only an unqualified attorney for this case, but is also a poor record keeper.  
Would this fly with an attorney billing a client?  I don't know..... maybe some attorney here could weigh in.  [/quote]

I have to wonder about Merchant's acumen when she apparently couldn't tell the difference between an invoice date versus when the work was actually done.[/quote]

[b]Once again.... is this type of billing notation acceptable when an attorney is billing a private client[/b]?  
Does this DA's office not expect a better level of detail for billing?  [/quote]

This would never fly at my law firm in DC.  No client would pay it.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics