Reply to Science channel's "Biblical Mysteries Explained"

Forum Index » Religion

Reply to "Science channel's "Biblical Mysteries Explained""

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

Lustful descriptions of rampant fornication and adultery were examples of a hedonistic society of men taking treating women as sex objects. And this is indicative of the low status women were put in, yes. There is no nobility or dignity in disregarding the sanctity of marriage or engaging in acts that produce illegitimate children. [/quote]
As long as women were free to treat men as sex objects, it's not an indication of a low status of women.  Is there evidence lustful descriptions were limited to men?

As far as disregarding "the sanctity of marriage", most women will feel bringing women #2, #3 and #4 into the marriage without their consent violates its sanctity as much  - or more - as any lustful descriptions.  "Illegitimate children" is a social construct - a child is whatever society agrees to consider him or her.

[quote=Anonymous]
The vast majority of the most important scholars disagree with you. So please stop publishing false or misleading information about Islam. [/quote]
Leila Ahmed doesn't - is she not a scholar?

I"ll publish what I see fit, thanks. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics