Reply to Third round options on Woodward Boundary study

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Third round options on Woodward Boundary study"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Anyone else notice that none of the three new options send SSIMS students to Sligo? In all three, current SSIMS students go to either Eastern or TPMS. Begs the question of the size they are going to make eastern (presumably huge, which is terrible) and also puts in question the future of ms magnets. The only way they will have enough room to accommodate all those kids at eastern and TPMS is if they do away with the magnets. What a disaster this plan is. Why would they spend all that money to renovate Sligo if it won’t be taking on more kids? What will happen to language immersion if they close SSIMS? Did they come up with this entire plan —after— releasing the first two rounds of options? Taylor is ruining east county with this half baked idiotic plan.[/quote]

SSIMS will split between Eastern, and then TPMS instead of Sligo?

It's too bad that Taylor can't take the considered advice of experienced staff before he announces his sweeping changes. It would keep his impulsiveness in better check if he developed that habit. There is a lot of whipsaw going on with major changes being announced every time there is a new version of the boundaries. PP said it correctly: it's a carnival show.[/quote]

What are you talking about?  All three of the new options contemplate adding hundreds of students to Sligo once SSIMS closes.  See, e.g., option F (where Sligo’s student body goes from 699 in 2025 to 1065 in 2031). [/quote]

But none of the areas being proposed to add to Sligo are from SSIMS.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics