Reply to King Charles strips Andrew’s prince title

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "King Charles strips Andrew’s prince title"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.[/quote]

In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.[/quote]

He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London. [/quote]

Is it not possible that he thought he was hiring a consenting prostitute! [/quote]

You’re actually defending this creep. So very gross. Epstein was convicted the first time years ago. Yes, Andrew absolutely knew the girls were underaged in the US and were trafficked. [/quote]

How do we know what he knew? He has denied all of it. What's the proof you're relying on?[/quote]

The BRF clearly knows more than the public. Charles would never have taken such extra measures unless he knows the evidence.[/quote]

PP, ignore the MAGA creep who is defending Andrew and has already admitted to trolling here. There are adults here who are more worth your time. [/quote]

Again, what proof? His accuser is dead. You can’t just make facts up.[/quote]

Welp House Oversight Committee dems just released Epstein emails that say “of course Trump knew” and calls him the “dog that hasn’t barked.” Maxwell also wrote that Trump spent hours at Epstein’s house with a girl whose name has been redacted (but CNN says it saw an unredacted version and it’s Giuffre).

Need more proof? More emails are coming, including, reportedly, damning  pictures of Trump.

Maybe we don’t need Andrew after all, and I was one of those pushing hardest for his testimony. [/quote]

Oh, I thought you said "he knew", meaning Andrew, not Trump. But you're still looking for that evidence as it turns out.[/quote]

Oh, there’s a Getty picture of Andrew with Trump and Epstein at Mar al Lago (can’t post it because it’s licensed, but it’s easy to search up).

Maybe Andrew can testify over zoom at the impeachment trial.[/quote]

Maybe but you're basically just blowing a bunch of hot air making claims you can't back up of who knew what when. That's not going to send anyone to jail.[/quote]

Stop trolling and head over to the Political forum for a discussion of Epstein/Maxwell/Wolff emails just released by House Oversight dems. Proof positive. Bye now. [/quote]

You mean where the grownups are? Because clearly you're a child who argues without facts but has a lot of big feelings. The troll is you, friend.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics