Reply to NYT: "The Trouble with Men"

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "NYT: "The Trouble with Men""

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yes you can have a kid on your own but depriving that kid of a mom or a dad is a selfish decision. [/quote]
Something like 25% of kids are being raised without a father. I hope you admonish every dead beat loser who puts a check in the mail instead of being a father. [/quote]

I hope you admonish every evil loser who denies her ex husband access to his kids just to spite him.[/quote]
Right right. If you were actually a good dad you wouldn’t be “denied access”. Time to face the music, youre the deadbeat we’re talking about NOT settling for.[/quote]

Women 100% deny access to good dads just to spite them. [/quote]

Wtf. Almost every state is 50/50 custody even if you are an abuser to anyone but the kid.

It’s sad that the only way to get some males with kids to parent is via the court system. Guess their (first) family and marriage weren’t worth growing up for. [/quote]

What's truly sad is that so many moms who are 100% responsible for whom they choose to procreate with, don't make better choices

There wouldn't be any dead beat dads at all if women weren't constantly using irresponsible unprotected sex to fulfill their own emotional needs, with no thought at all as to the suitability of the men they are choosing to procreate with

Try as you might to wriggle out of the inevitable conclusion, women are the gatekeepers to their own wombs.  If they grant access injudisciously, they are  solely responsible for the consequences.[/quote]

That’s the point of all the recent articles and discord: women are making better choices and skipping over duds.

One problem is there are way more male duds than male non-duds or female duds.
[/quote]

From the male point of view, just the opposite. There are more female duds than male duds.

Female duds: unpleasant to be around, crazy, physically unattractive - and yet nevertheless has an absurd list of demands for what she wants men to be and do.

And women wonder why men are increasingly indifferent to them. Astounding lack of self awareness, smh.[/quote]
Don’t understand.  Can you pls provide some examples of each?

Unpleasant to be around, for example:
-[b] Women who can't hold a conversation without it being about them
-[/b] Women who don't have any interests other than their phone and what instagram tells them

Crazy, for example:
- [b] Many women in this town have grown up in the peak era of third-wave, gaslight/gatekeep/girlboss feminism. They have never been told no in their lives
- [/b] Just insane checklists and requirements for a romantic partner. Ironically increases as they age.

Physically unattractive, for example:
- [b] Fat. In this town, you can clean up as a woman if you simply are not fat. This extends to not being chubby either. It's not hard, just don't guzzle frappacunios and muffins everyday, go for a walk.
- [/b] Don't know how to dress. See above - if you have a muffin top, wearing crop tops doesn't help your case. Simultaneously, if you work a white-collar office job like I assume most women on this forum do, don't have your tits and ass hanging out at the office. 
[/quote][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics