Reply to What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "What exactly is the democratic party going to stand for in 2026 and 2028?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It doesn't seem like democrats are going to adjust their platform at all. They seem to be doubling down, if anything. They are spending millions to learn "how to talk to young men," learning their slang in a "hello fellow kids" way. That means they are going to be consistent with their issues but adjust their messaging a bit. Probably this time, they won't hire a bunch of gay actors to pretend to be straight white men and say hilarious things like "I'm man enough to vote for Kamala Harris."

Dem top issues will remain the same: trans, gay, race quotas, the patriarchy, white women as "the problem," Palestine, protesting as the peak expression of politics, and getting more women to have abortions. [/quote]
Not a single one of those issues was a significant part of Harris’ platform except for reproductive freedom.  Why to you insist on lying?[/quote]

Be serious. Trans wasn’t part of her platform because it was unpopular and voters hate it. And yet Democrats persist in putting men in women’s sports, locker rooms, and prisons. I don’t what they campaign on, I pay attention to what they are actually doing. Let me know when Dems stop pushing men in women’s spaces and maybe I’ll consider voting for them again. [/quote]

If the majority of people in California are okay with biological males competing in female sports, so be it. I don't live in California. If you live in California and don't like it, move or vote better. "Men in women's sports" isn't something Dems are pushing for nationally. It's a local thing. Get over it. [/quote]

Californian here. I think it is possible this state will go red over issues like this, and I didn’t think that was possible for most of my life. [/quote]

And this is why Californian politicians aren't viewed favorably nationally. They're all lumped in with one another in being viewed as too liberal. Dem politicians in swing states are much more moderate and therefore have a much better chance of success nationally. This same dynamic exists in the GOP. There is no way in heck an evangelically extreme conservative politician from Mississippi is going to fare well nationally.[/quote]

San Francisco (!) has already gone sharply rightward. Still Democrats of course but politically adverse to the progressives.

I think it is actually possible a Republican who came across as reasonable could win California. Now whether California’s crazy Republicans could manage to find a reasonable Republican is another question, but never in my adult life have I even thought that possible before.

The Democratic dedication to elevating gender-based rights over sex-based rights is going to lose the party even in places like California. It is incomprehensible, and I can only conclude there are massive donations involved, because it’s a suicidal party policy otherwise. [/quote]

Why do you think San Fran has gone sharply rightward?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics