Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "DOJ, RIP"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Here is Ms Oyer’s resume: Georgetown, Harvard, partner at Mayer Brown, 10 years as a federal defender. Whoever the jack*ss here trying to impugn here is, you are a complete joke. https://www.justice.gov/archives/pardon/staff-profile/former-pardon-attorney-oyer[/quote] Are you suggesting that her credentials mean she is above politics? Here are her publicly stated complaints: 1. She was escorted off premises after she was involuntarily terminated after a policy disagreement with administration officials. Please tell me what is wrong with this fairly standard practice of escorting people off premises after involuntary termination? What is wrong with firing a civil servant who disagrees with an administration on policy issues? 2. She was given a letter reminding her of her duty to keep confidential information to herself under the privilege doctrine. Tell me what is illegal or even out of the ordinary about this? Lawyers get these kinds of letters all the time with regards to privilege or conflicts. 3. Marshals were dispatched to her home to hand deliver notice after she had failed to acknowledge receipt of notice delivered to her email address. After she acknowledged receipt the marshals were recalled. The marshals never reached her house. They did not have contact with her or her family. Exactly what is wrong here? Even if you think this was heavy handed it hardly rises to tampering or intimidation. [/quote] I think everyone except you understands that when an attorney with that resume is fired and testifies before Congress, we tend to take it seriously. And no matter what you claim, the US Marshals being used to send a letter to a former employee is highly irregular and not backed by the law or DOJ policy. You are just transparently embarrassed that Trump’s antics go so far as to (check notes) try to get a gun back for a weirdo washed up Hollywood wife beater. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics