Reply to "Justice" a new documentary on Kavanaugh

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to ""Justice" a new documentary on Kavanaugh "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I cannot believe that someone could watch both testimonies and walk away from that thinking that Kavanaugh was fit to be on the Supreme Court. All he needed to do was the calmly say something like how he didn’t believe that he was possible of doing that, that he did have a drinking problem when he was a teenager and that he’s spent the rest of his life trying to be a supporter of women by hiring a greater percentage of female clerks than the vast majority of judges. People who would be willing to say that people can change from their 18-year old selves. Instead he lied about his drinking, he lied about his behaviors in high school and college and he went completely unhinged about the Clintons and how he hates all Democrats. Frankly we should only have justices who can rise above partisanship- instead was have an immoral, unhinged, extreme partisan on the court. Just what we need. [/quote]
+1 The people who support Bretty after that mess are blinded by partisanship. They’re the same people who pretend not to see the political violence their party has caused, who look away from the open fraud and corruption in their party and who will support corruption and judicial activism from the bench. They’re a lost cause.

But for the sane people who don’t know what to think, go back and rewatch both testimonies. Sit with the fact that Kennedy had already hired his clerks before suddenly retiring, and that his son worked at Deutschebank where Donald owed millions. That Kavanaugh owed huge sums that were mysteriously paid off. Think about how, in normal non-corrupt judgeships, even the appearance of possible impropriety isn’t done. That the FBI did not investigate a single tip received about Kavanaugh, that no investigation was done at all, that all tips were funneled to… the White House.

Literally nothing about Kavanaugh bespeaks for the bench, especially not his partisan targeting of the Clintons’ private lives and then his moaning about people looking into his.[/quote]

But it's not about supporting him when talking about her. No one ever even got to really talk about his record because this lie became the central conversation to him being appointed. I didn't like him at all, I don't have a vote, and I didn't get to hear much about him because it became all about this fake story and not his record. You can actually not like him for other reasons and not like her. It's not a one or the othe[b]r. This scenario is just something the democrat committee and her made up as the actual issue of the day.[/b][/quote]
 :roll: Miss me with your misogyny.

His “record.” He’s a GOP foot soldier, a participant in the GOP’s 2000 end run on democracy. There were thousands of pieces discussing his record and what it meant. If you were unable to do any research of your own and you just read headlines, that’s [i]your[/i] failure. [/quote]

This issue took center stage. That is what I meant. Sure there were other issues that I had with him, but none of them really were debated because the nation had to spend so much time on this. All the other issues got swept under because the democrat committee decided none of them would be strong enough and so went with this issue instead.[/quote]
The “democrat committee” was majority Republican.

Kavanaugh’s record as a partisan hack was well known and is why it took him years to get confirmed to the federal bench in the first place.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics