Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Britney Griner deal"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Bout is not going to go right back to what he was doing. He's been in prison for 10 years. All of his customer base has found new dealers in the interim and he now has the mark as "that guy who got busted by the Americans." Potential customers are going to find someone less stained and more current on how the arms world is going. He's been out of the game too long. I think the handwringing about what a villain he is, is overblown. Yes, he's a bad guy. The world is full of bad guys. He's not bin Laden or Pol Pot. He's a generic mercenary. This was not a catastrophic exchange beyond the irritant factor of the Russians getting something they wanted. I'm not sure standing on principle to avoid that and letting Griner languish in a penal colony for being a pawn in a game she probably didn't understand is worth it and am fine with the swap. Whelan's case is much more complicated than it appears and I'm not at all sure how innocent he really was. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
