Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Cheney to General Flynn: "Do you believe in the peaceful transition of power in the U.S.?" General Flynn: "Fifth." That's terrifying. [/quote] Always remember that his brother was the Army Chief of Operations, was one of the people that orevented the DC Nat Guard from being deployed (a fact that the DOD lied about), and was given a promotion. All of this was in the timeframe in question. He's currenty in charge of Pacific Command.[/quote] Being related to a treason-weasel isn't a crime. I haven't seen anything to suggest that the brother is loony, only Flynn. And he's been a loon for a long time. [/quote] Except the Flynn brother significantly delayed troop support to the Capitol Police. It's not a stretch to believe that he was in on the coup and wanted the rioters to succeed. [/quote] No. We can agree to disagree but I believe that was the right call. The insurrectionists were handled very well by the Capitol Police and by MPD. The National Guard and other troops were not needed and should not have been called there. [/quote] Strongly disagree. A Cap. Policemen DIED and others asked for back up repeatedly. A capitol policewoman testified it was a war zone that she was not qualified to deal with. The Flynn brother knew this and chose to do nothing. He was in dereliction of his duty, because he was BIASED: the worst explanation is that he wanted the coup to succeed. The best explanation is that he thought it wouldn’t and he did not wish to annoy the WH by harming the rioters, “Trump’s people”. I plump for the former. Either you’re too uninformed to be writing opinions like these, or you’re in with the traitors, PP. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics