Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "DeSantis and FL moving to hammer Disney"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This should make everyone afraid, regardless of party affiliation. A company disagrees with a politician on a [insert description here] issue and within weeks has a 50+ year deal revoked. That doesn't scare the crap out of you people??? [/quote] So now you are ok with big companies getting tax breaks? Everyone was all for taxing them before. Which is it? Companies need to pay their fair share, or the breaks are good?[/quote] Just stop it with the "tax breaks". There are no tax breaks. Disney pays more taxes to the state of Florida than any other entity in the state. They are biggest tax revenue for the state, bigger than any other part of the huge tourism industry. And even if they were getting tax breaks, the law that was just past has nothing to do with taxes. It is about the creation and dissolution of special districts. In this case, a special district was created for the Walt Disney World land unit essentially setting it up like a local township or county. There are no tax breaks involved. Reedy Creek Improvement District allows Disney to manage the properties like a town, they have their own internal security (instead of police), they have fire and emergency services, they run a health clinic which is like a large Urgent Care facility and the medical services are administered by AdventHealth which is the group that maintains many of the hospitals in the greater Orlando region. They handle traffic, roadways, infrastructure, public transit, trash, utilities including water and sewage. Disney covers all of that without taxing any of the county residents or the <100 residents of the RDIC (Lake Buena Vista and Bay Lake communities). Now, if RDIC is dissolved, the two counties, Orange and Osceola will then become responsible for providing all of those services to WDW. The counties are going to have to create a tax structure to tax the corporation for services, then they are going to have to create the infrastructure to start providing all of those services or take over the management of the facilities that WDW already owns and maintains. If they take over the existing facilities, they are going to have to come up with contracts to cover renting and leasing the facilities. And they are going to have to start providing services to the company immediately. Additionally, they are going to have the create the bureaucracy to administer and manage all of the above and permitting, inspection, review of all existing and future construction. It's been estimated that it will cost about $2200-2800 per county resident in the two counties to cover the costs of assuming all of that infrastructure. Even if they start to tax WDW for the services, with the renting and leasing of Disney facilities, it is still going to cost the residents of the county a lot of money to provide all of the services. They will be lucky if they can create a tax structure that will halve the increased costs to the county residences for Disney. And they are going to need to create all of that and get things in place by summer 2023 (about 15-16 months) before the new law takes effect. These two counties are going to be destroyed and county residents are going to have to put up with a complete breakdown of county services as the country tries to get things under control in time. As I posted above, this is not going to happen. Disney will be able to get legal injunctions to stop the enforcement of the new law. But if you think this is in any way good for the state, state residents, counties or county residents, you just don't have any idea what just happened. The only ones who will reap any gain from this are politicians who have fleeced their constituents into thinking this was good. Financially this is horrible for the state.[/quote] Why would Disney block this? Is it bad for Disney?[/quote] Yes. Disney makes decisions on how to handle all of the administration from a purely business/profit standpoint. They provide all those services and they do so at far higher standards that the local counties and state require. This way they give a better experience and continue to keep their standards high. If the administration reverted back to the counties, the counties would do things to cost rather than to the higher standards. The counties already cannot afford to provide services and would not be able to maintain the standards that Disney maintains. Quality would go way down and Disney would have a problem maintaining the experience that has made them the go-to vacation destination in the nation. Additionally, as a special district they can do things to a timetable that they set themselves. If control reverts back to the county, you would add huge layers of bureaucratic red tape to any type of development and infrastructure. Think of it this way. When Disney decides to make renovations to the parks or build new facilities, they get to set the timetable. If you want to add an addition to your house, how much control do you and your contractors have on the timetable? In most construction, the biggest limitations on time are applications, permits, inspections, etc. All government red tape designed to document everything that goes on. Right? Add those costs in and Disney deciding to open a new park or hotel or renovate features and suddenly instead of 2-5 years, it will be 8-10 years to get things done. It would be horrible for their business model if services were dropped to the most costly solutions and if they were forced to have to abide by local bureaucracy to get everything done. And they can't just throw money at a problem. Now, if things aren't moving fast enough, throw money at the problem and resolve issues right away and get back on schedule. Add in government bureaucracy and you're suddenly slowed to a snail's pace and everything is out of your hands and control. The combination of loss of higher standards and worse, the time added for bureaucratic red tape would be horrific for Disney.[/quote] Time for Disney to start looking for a WDW 2.0. I suggest Georgia. [/quote] I would suggest nowhere with a Republican majority. I live in Florida and I feel like the Republicans here are the dogs who caught the car. What do they think is going to happen now? I have to assume there will be some sort of negotiated compromise that lets Rs tell everyone they've really stuck it to Disney - STUCK IT TO DISNEY - while still allowing Disney to operate as it is, more or less. It is just impossible - completely untenable - for Orange and Osceola Counties to take over the functions Disney is now providing for its own properties. It won't work. And as much as Rs suddenly hate Disney - I still can't believe I am writing those words - Disney is a massive employer, and a HUGE driver of tourism, and what in the actual :OIHNECF LUEH are they playing at here? Not enough to ban math books and punish trans kids anymore - now we're going to destroy tourism and big employers, too?[/quote] This is completely untrue. Disney can operate in the same manner as the other parks, many of which have special tax breaks and other benefits but not a complete district. Disney will be fine either way. It doesn’t need this district anymore. [/quote] No, they can't operate in the same manner as the other parks - and they certainly can't operate as they have. I just cannot with you gd idiots. You are so stupid, so short-sighted, so ignorant and determined to burn down everything the second your newest Dear Leader says to light the match. [/quote] I don’t care what happens in Florida. But Disney absolutely can operate just fine without their special district. Disney World will be fine no matter the outcome. [/quote] DP. I don't think you understand how much Disney relies upon Reedy Creek to operate the way it does. Did you know that the Disney monorail is actually Reedy Creek public transit system? If Reedy Creek disappears, it will be controlled by the localities that take over the former district, and Disney will lose control over its operation. They will no longer be able to staff it with Disney employees and dictate the standards of conduct for employees, it will be all local government employees. Maintenance is a major factor here for the Disney experience. A big part of why service disruptions on the monorail system are so infrequent and brief is that Disney has mechanics and other maintenance workers on site around the clock to do maintenance on the system every night and then immediately respond to any issues that may come up during the day. No other level of government in the U.S. puts a comparable level of resources into maintenance of their mass transit systems to Disney. Are you going to pay premium Disney prices to stay at a Disney resort and buy tickets to Disney parks if the monorail system functions the way the DC Metro does, constant breakdowns, shutting down entire lines for maintenance for weeks at a time, running limited trains so you might have to wait 20 minutes or more for one to arrive, and service delays that could last hours until can get a maintenance crew there? Of course not. And the same goes for the Skyliner, which would kill the Disney resorts relying on that for easy park access. [/quote] Not to mention that every time they want to build a new ride, they are now going to have to have government safety inspectors approving and monitoring the process. Should do wonderers for Disney's impeccable safety record once the same people who approved this operation are in charge of things in Disney. https://www.tampabay.com/news/florida/2022/04/18/sensors-were-adjusted-on-orlando-amusement-park-ride-where-teen-fell-to-death/ It'll probably be a seamless process when Disney's quest to innovate is caught up in local red tape. I bet fire and emergency services will be awesome, too, once Disney is stripped of its powers. [/quote] Disney will have to play by the same rules as its competitors. (A level playing field. Oh no :shock: )[/quote] Set aside spite and pettiness for a moment. Who do you think will benefit from this if it goes forward? Not Florida residents - they will get hit with additional tax bills to pay for the Reedy Creek debt and all of the municipal services Reedy Creek currently manages itself. It will reduce employment opportunities in that region of Florida because the surrounding local governments aren't going to staff those functions at the same level Disney does, and probably will pay lower wages. Local businesses will be hurt when tourism declines because Disney becomes a lesser experience, and also from the reduced wages flowing to local residents. Other parks will be hurt as well. You think anyone is going to travel to Florida just to go to Legoland? No, but plenty of people who travel to Florida to go to Disney also add a day trip to see Legoland. Not to mention all of the other tourism-related businesses that will suffer from decreased tourism in the state. This all will lead to reduced state-level taxes, so citizens across the state will lose out when Florida has to make budget cuts as a result. So who benefits? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics