Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "What's your favorite celebrity mystery or secret scandal?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]How come they seriously can’t figure out who killed Biggie and Tupac? [/quote] Right? You'd think there would be footage of this somewhere, or people talking. [b]And who killed Jon Benet?[/b] Or kidnapped Madeleine McCann?[/quote] I think nearly everyone who has looked closely at the case agrees: it was the brother. And the parents covered it up. [/quote] I just don't see it. Burke wasn't their golden child like JonBenet. Why protect your 2nd choice kid? [/quote] Because they'd already lost one kid. Not protecting Burke wouldn't bring Jonbenet back, and they would likely lose their other kid. I'm not saying that I'd do the same thing they did, but I can understand wanting to keep your only remaining child out of the juvenile system for what may have been an accident. Maybe he would've gotten some kind of lenient sentence, but they didn't know that in the moment. I hope they got him whatever help he needed over the years.[/quote] I’ve read so much on this case and it was definitely the brother. It seems like it was an accident and their parents were utterly traumatized and made up a story so that he wouldn’t get in trouble. I think they honestly couldn’t conceive of a way of dealing with the murder of their child by their son so they went on total denial and invented a story to tell the media.[/quote] I think several experts were comfortable going on record stating jon Benet showed evidence of earlier sexual abuse trauma and that the son had chronic, known behavioral issues as well. I think the wealth and status of the parents in this family offered a veneer of innocence that suggested a functioning, normal family but after reading a lot about the case, it is fair to say that it was a chaotic and psychologically troubled family. If the known intruder theory is correct (and it may be, whoever did it likely knew the house) their circle iseemed to include a variety of troubled, shady people. I am curious about how they functioned before the tragedy, what kind of parents they were behind closed doors (the evidence suggests the mother was reactive, in a stretch of frustration with the children, etc). They looked like the quintessential successful family but they had their pathology and I am curious about what that was exactly.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics