Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Reinstate School Resource Officers at MCPS"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]All students deserve to feel safe at school. We need more bodies in the high schools and I am happy the SRO's will be there and kids will see their presence. I am not a Trumpie, but I do believe that schools need to feel safe which they don't right now.[/quote] It's too bad. Most are rightly more afraid of the police than each other.[/quote] They found a 17 year old kid dead in the woods a block from Seneca Valley high school yesterday. You think it was the police? [/quote] If only an SRO was at school the kid would be alive. /s[/quote] He is alive idiot.[/quote] The dead kid from behind Seneca valley is alive?[/quote] I've noticed that the people who are most anti-SRO and andt-police are white liberals who have criminal family members who had run ins with the police. The people least anti-police are mothers who work hard and try to raise their children in a better way than they had. I wonder which one you are.[/quote] Police that work with SRO's and know how useless the program is.[/quote] Only criminals and anti-cops believe this.[/quote] No actually people who actually understand the program think that. Take the SRO's, make the ones that have no degree get one in psychology or education and pay for it, take away arrest powers and make them live under the same code of conduct at teachers. SROs should only be involved in life saving events. They should not be glorified security guards, they should not be sitting in a room eating donuts, they should not be harassing kids for minor things that teachers can handle and principals should deal with. If they can't do the minimum to be around kids they don't belong in schools. They take washed up cops or ones that are not effective on the street or can't be trusted and they throw them in this program. Do not just take washups, recruit for this position, train for this position... act like it's not a second thought.[/quote] It is clear you know nothing about the SRO program. I’m curious whether you’ve even had any interaction with an SRO. The council has done a beautiful job smearing the program. In reality, the SROs play a vital role in the school. They are not glorified security guards. (I should know. I worked for a long time in a school with both.) You act as if SROs are poorly trained and/or should be feared. You are wrong. They are trained police. Outside of schools, the vast majority of police interactions contain absolutely no use of force… like close to 99% of interactions. And within schools? Even less. In Montgomery County during the 2019-2020 school year, they initiated only nine arrests county-wide. Just nine. They are NOT a threat to students. The data doesn’t back that up. People who know… like 100% of principals… know the value the SRO has to the school. If you still have concerns, particularly if/when they are reinstated, try talking to the school and the SRO. I suspect you’ll find that your concerns are unfounded. [/quote] You know SRO’s are not required to have a 4year degree. You wouldn’t even allow a teacher to teach with that little education. They are very poorly trained. They have no training for dealing with kids . If you think the 2-4 week training is “education” you should sit in on that too. It’s not a use of fired issue and the fact you don’t know the difference Seuss means you need to educate yourself. Please read some scholarly articles and research on these programs.[/quote] They are required to have 30 college credits. But the thinking of "I don't like the job requirements so throw the baby out with the bathwater" is just dumb. If you don't feel like They get enough training then lobby for more. They don't have enough training therefor we don't need them is illogical. [/quote] I didn’t say “we don’t need them” I said reinstating the same mess we had before again is another knee jerk reaction. How about we actually hire trained people to keep kids safe instead of people that did 30 gen ed credits at their community college.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics