Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "School Board Meeting 9/23"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Books at fcps high schools promoting pedophilia and pornography, true? Can anyone verify if this is true? [twitter]https://twitter.com/AsraNomani/status/1441356537163706378?s=19[/twitter] [/quote] Wow. That graphic novel. How is cartoon pedophilia legal much less approved to be in schools? Wtf???[/quote] You are completely nuts. There is no “pedophilia” in either book. A cartoon drawing of a sexual act is not pornography unless it is objectively indented to sexually arouse the reader. Is it prurient and salacious? It is ridiculous to claim so. No kid - not even in 7th grade, is turning to page 46 of a graphic novel about queerness in order to get off. Actual porn is right in his hands on his phone. It’s not 1923. [/quote] Apparently the school board agrees that it is. The books were both pulled.[/quote] The books were pulled and the review process triggered. This is not the SB agreeing that they are inappropriate. It is forming a committee as laid out in the regulation about school library material challenges. [/quote] Fine with me. In general, I am anti censorship but I am certainly not going to die on the hill of “Lawn Boy.” [/quote] I personally don't think it's worth defending, but on the other hand, it is worth defending as it will just lead to parents combing over tons of books in the library, trigging these challenges, and tying up educators who are just trying to get kids reading and back in the groove of school this year. Censorship is a slippery slope. [/quote] Frankly, there are TONS of great books out there for kids to read. The books in question don't fit into the category of "great books." If you want your kid to read them, buy them or go to a public library. I am a former educator and not keen on book banning, but I also believe schools should be selective about the books they purchase for their libraries given limited funding. [/quote] Why aren’t they “great”? [/quote] Because they are way too sexually explicit for a high school library. They are porn.[/quote] You are objectively wrong. Pornography is by definition intended to sexually arouse. These books have mature language but they aren’t intended to sexually arouse the reader. Your average grocery store romance novel has way more explicit passages than these, and far less literary value. The committees reviewing the books will allow them to remain in the few library collections that have them. The problem is that the damage will have been done…damage being ginning up this entire manufactured controversy to pull more voters for the GOP side. Because most people, like commenters here, have emotional reactions that are precisely the intent of this manufactured controversy…they’re based on information taken out of context and entirely misrepresented. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics