Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "What do you think of YIMBYs?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This "entitlement" stuff really relies on twisting the literal meaning of YIMBY. I live in upper NW Ward 3, in a single-family house that we own, and I'm in favor of building much more density here, especially affordable housing but also both small and large apartment buildings. So I'd consider myself a YIMBY because -- unlike NIMBYs -- I don't oppose new development near my house ("in my backyard"). How is it "entitled" for me to want things to happen that, according to all the people here who oppose YIMBYism, will make my neighborhood less pleasant, change its character, reduce my home value and increase crowding in my kids' schools?[/quote] May I ask you, Ward 3, where all this density you desire will be built? Tearing down 1920s homes and trees, perhaps? Building on the small pieces of greenspace that exist? Maybe you ask AU to build some of that housing on its campus? Instead of dorms? There is a tremendous amount of development going on now (view from Maine Avenue and over to Nats park and then some) in D.C. But - yes, you do you and build a condo in your back yard.[/quote] I am a different Ward 3 resident. There are a ton of surface parking lots that can be developed. The Wardman as a site can be a lot of new buildings. The entirety of Friendship Heights can be redeveloped. There can be moderate increased density allowed on parts of Connecticut Avenue that could allow for some expansions or infill development. Property owners can be encouraged to add ADUs. Just like all of those garden apartments, there can be added density in that form up and down all of our transit corridors. There can be new structures built that look like a single family home, but are, in fact, 2,3 or 4-plexes. So yes, there are a lot of places where new density can go without impinging on your single family house.[/quote] Sounds charming! Send us your traffic impact reports on Western/Wisconsin area and Connecticut - which already has a slew of condo buildings. Maybe bring a Dollar Store or Five Below too. [/quote] Add bus and bike lanes and make it harder for people to keep wasting space with single occupancy vehicles. Frankly, I don't care how suburbanites need to get into the city. They chose to live "out there" - why should I sacrifice and subsidize their choices with the quality of life on our streets?[/quote] No worries. They in fact subsidize you because their businesses are based in DC. With COVID and WFH, they may no longer commute to DC. Who loses? DC. Yes, maybe, they head into a few times a year for a Nats games or a museum tour. But they will be based elsewhere. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics