Reply to Robin Hood just ended trading on GameStop and AMC

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Robin Hood just ended trading on GameStop and AMC"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why is this in politics, d scum [/quote]

I missed the investment opportunity but am waiting on news that the hedge funds grovel for a new bailout. Wall St needs to stop eating avocado toast lunches and bootstraps through market volatility. [/quote]

This administration better not even think of bailing these idiots out of this one.[/quote]

Jen Psaki’s brother is a portfolio manager at Citadel. Janet Yellen has taken $800K in fees from Citadel.

Slap on the wrist and keep it moving. [/quote]

Um, Janet Yellen is at the Treasury, not the SEC.  Do you even know the difference?  But hey,  Diamond Hands!![/quote]

What’s your point? My point was about conflicts of interest in the Biden administration.[/quote]

That sounds totally Trumpian.  Any connection = a conflict of interest for the entire organization.  I'm sure I could find members of the Biden administration who have equity positions in GameStop.  Oh wait, look Blackrock made a billion dollars off of the Gamestop runup, and it's chock full of Biden connections!  https://www.businessinsider.com/what-to-know-about-blackrock-larry-fink-biden-cabinet-facts-2020-12

See, that was easy.  [/quote]

You’re deflecting. Everything that you don’t like is “Trumpian”. Stop acting like regulatory capture and revolving door haven’t been issues for some time now.[/quote]

This. Amen. [/quote]

[b]No, you need to demonstrate a conflict, not merely fish around for a connection.[/b]  I just gave you a connection that works in the favor of Gamestop.  So do they cancel each other out?  Are they both meaningless?  Or do you get to pick the one you like, without any evidence to support them?

It's exactly like Trump blaming a judge's Mexican heritage for blocking his travel ban.  Or blaming WaPo stories on their connection to Bezos.  Or insinuating that Mueller can't be trusted because he worked with Comey.

This is how conspiracy theorists work.  They dig out connections and then without proof declare them to be evidence of a conspiracy.[/quote]

Not trying to throw this thread off topic, but I have two words:  Russian collusion.  
If you want to talk about fishing around for connections, look no further than this board, the big name media people and the Democrats.
The connections some in the Biden admin have to big tech and Wall street are concerning and several Senators have expressed this concern. 
And, you have people like Pelosi and Feinstein with questionable stock transactions after the election.  
If we had a truly unbiased media, they would be investigating these connections in light of this story.  But we don't.  [/quote]

Nope. There were some really fishy ties between the Trump campaign and Russia. It was right to investigate. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics