Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Can someone explain “defund” the police vs police reform?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Armed and dangerous police officers should, perhaps, not be pulling people over for broken taillights. Or driving with one's high beams on. Or having a crooked license plate. Or passing a possibly fake $20. Or noisy neighbors. Or speaking to a woman while you are bird watching in the park. These things that begin as trivial to-often result in armed and dangerous police harming or killing citizens. Armed and dangerous police response should be reserved for serious situations, armed and dangerous aggressors, etc. Is it necessary for them to conduct a no-knock door break down in the dead of the night where residents get shot? For what, drugs? Legalize it. Should use of or possession of drugs result in a life behind bars? Sure, home invasion in progress, someone being beaten, threatened, etc I understand the need for armed law enforcement. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
