Reply to APS: Think the "no move" campaign is going to work?

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "APS: Think the "no move" campaign is going to work?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I wonder if Erica Hewitt, Mac Mirchandani, Carly Kelly, Tamara McFadden, Emily Kahoe Chen, Kim Dam, Amanda Batchelet, Kendra Ervin, Kathleen Clark and Nathan McQueen knew that their names would be released publicly when they tried to throw Tuckahoe and Nottingham under the bus?[/quote]

I am not a McKinley but I know some of those people on that list. The were cc:Ed on the email. That does not mean all of them were in support of the proposals. Some of them were at the meeting or on the email because of their volunteer roles for local civic associations. [/quote]

What is up with the Ashlawn boundary they are proposing?  This team of data "experts" must be laughed at by APS Staff.  They didn't even deserve a response.[/quote]

I'm confused - which Ashlawn boundary are you talking about? [/quote]

DP, but I think they mean Mckinleys salamander boundary suggestion https://mckinleypta.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Boundary-Only-Scenario-Map.pdf[/quote]

Only slightly better is the Ashlawn boundary in their Nottingham/Tuckahoe as option school scenarios.  Both are worse than the current tail.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics