Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Latin replication pulled from PCSB agenda"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There has been A LOT of discussion about Latin not serving at-risk kids, but what I am looking at seems to show that Latin is not able to educate brown kids who are NOT at risk. In other words, Latin is NOT working for black and brown kids who are middle class. WTF? This is what needs to be looked at. Why are the black kids at Latin who are MIDDLE CLASS and UMC not benefiting from this school that is supposedly so great? How could we even consider letting Latin try to educate at-risk kids when they are FAILING kids of color who have advantages and educated parents? DC makes no sense - and Latin’s record is making no sense.[/quote] This. What the heck is going on here and why are Latin parents okay with it?[/quote] Come on, AA students don't perform as well collectively as white students across socioeconomic strata. This outcome has been proven in study after study for over half a century. It's worth remembering that blacks are still fairly new to the middle class as a group (generally only in their second or third generation). They're still catching up to whites on various measures of academic achievement, prosperity and health.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics