Reply to well no wonder Amy Chua defended Brett Kavanugh so emphatically

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "well no wonder Amy Chua defended Brett Kavanugh so emphatically"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night? 
[/quote]
Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.[/quote]

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

[/quote]

Facts?  Truth?  
How about presumption of innocence?  Blasey Ford was unable to provide any actual proof of her claims.  Zilch.  
She had no facts.  And, it appeared that her truth was just that - HER truth.  Not THE truth.  [/quote]

We will never know since it will never be investigated. So you can’t say if he was “falsely” accused or not. But the MAGAs still will try to tear her down.

Why are the daggers out? Afraid of the truth?

[/quote]

How, exactly, do you suggest investigating a 35 yr. old allegation?  Anyone who might have some information has been invited (repeatedly) to come forward.  No one has.  No one can corroborate this allegation.  In the meantime, [b]Kavanaugh has had six FBI investigations[/b], all of which turned up nothing.  No one is trying to "tear down" Blasey Ford, but you simply can't argue with the FACT that she had no evidence or witnesses to back up her claim.[/quote]

You are so f-ing clueless it’s painful. How on earth would those background checks uncover this incident?

[/quote]

Speaking of clueless - please do share how yet another FBI investigation would "uncover" this ALLEGED incident?  I'm genuinely curious.  Since no one has voluntarily come forward to corroborate Ford's testimony, then exactly what would you suggest the FBI do to "uncover" a vague, 35 year old, alleged incident?  Do you realize how utterly crazy you sound?[/quote]

The incident has already been reported so no need to “uncover” it, bonehead. It only would have only come out during a background check if BK added CBF to his list of interviewees. Don’t think he did. And if there were other incidents I’m sure his buddies wouldn’t have brought them up. Look at the hilarious way they handled the yearbook. Lying POSs.

The FBI could seek out people to interview - not just sit around waiting for someone to come forward. Look at other evidence (calendar).

Funny how you and the PPs are so quick to decide there is nothing there. Quite telling.

[/quote]

Oh, FFS.  
There was nothing there.  No witnesses.  No evidence.  No location.  No date.  
A judge would laugh this case out of the courtroom.  The FBI was probably thinking.... "You want us to investigate a claim that happened 35 years ago where the people reportedly present cannot verify it happened at a location that is unknown on a date that is unknown?   Sure.  And, next, we will find Jimmy Hoffa's body.  At least we have more evidence there."  
Face it - this was nothing more than an attempt to sully the reputation of a person that Trump nominated in order to force Trump to withdraw the nomination.  You failed, thank God.  [/quote]

Like I said, quite telling. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics