Reply to Trump’s Dementia

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Trump’s Dementia "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

“I read the NYT and WaPo every morning. Stories of Trump's mental incapacity - distinct from stories that criticize his decisions without mentioning his mental health - are exceedingly rare, and there has NEVER been an editorial about it in either newspaper during his second term! Recently, some Opinion pieces have been allowed to talk about it, either directly, like in the recent NYT piece, or very circuitously, like some WaPo articles.

So the main centrist newspapers are not on board yet. They have to get on board and be more forthright about his recent, very clear symptoms of dementia, such as when he was told to tell the press the Jesus image was doctored, but instead he said he thought it depicted him as a doctor. This is dereliction of duty at this point.”

Good summary.

It was dereliction of duty for the GOP to not wrest the codes from Trump when he threatened to destroy Iran.

[/quote]

Are you seriously calling the NY Times and Washington Post, centrist?  
[/quote]

Yes, I am, because this is what they are.

[/quote]

Centrist is too kind for what they are. They have normalized Trump's derangement by NEVER calling it out until a week ago. They have done more damage than anyone. Ended one subscription last year, the other this year.[/quote]

PP you replied to. I share that sentiment, but [b]there is no political word to designate media that fails to point out a President's mental health challenges.[/b] These newspapers are neither left nor right in their political bent. They're derelict in their duty to report on Trump's cognitive decline because they're terrified of being sued into bankruptcy. As are ALL major news sources in the US today, BTW. They're ALL cowards.

[/quote]

What if that same media source pointed out one president's challenges ad nauseum and then refused to point out the very next president's challenges even though they were much more evidencence and in every qualifiable way, by any matrices, eh was doing much more damage to the country and our institutions?

Yes, they are cowards, but if they apply their rules inconsistently and represent reality inconsistently they are not just derilect in their duties, they are serving that party.[/quote]j

EXACTLY.  There should be coverage that EXCEEDS the level of Biden coverage, because his decline is even WORSE and it is having far more of an impact on everything happening to this country.  He started a stupid war, for crying out loud!  That he can't justify and can't figure out how to get out of.  It's affecting the entire globe re: energy and economy.

25th NOW.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics