Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]To be fair, the Giant is in a new building, but that took a decade.[/quote] A new store would have been built a lot faster had Giant/Ahold not breached a 2002 agreement with the Williams Administration under which they agreed to build the new store. At the time, Ahold was under investigation from securities fraud, so perhaps it lost focus. The breach showed that Giant's word stinks about as much as its fish, and delayed a new store for several years.[/quote] A new store would have been built a lot faster if the original 1999 proposal hadn't been opposed by a bunch of NIMBYs, pre-Ahold. It also would have been one story, not touched the north parcel and had openings on Wisconsin Avenue. [/quote] This would have been great. I loved the shops on the old north parcel, and don't like how Cathedral Commons turned out. Poor design and way too much concrete.[/quote] This. And who had the dumb idea to build a smaller Starbucks that what existed on the site previously? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics