Reply to Has NPR lost America’s trust?

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Has NPR lost America’s trust? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Now even less of a balance left

[twitter]https://twitter.com/uberliner/status/1780610524411048183[/twitter][/quote]

I would really implore folks to read the response from (fellow white male) Steve Inskeep to the Berliner piece. He takes time to point out the factual inaccuracies in the Berliner article. Not stuff that is up for discussion, just flat out shoddy research that should have gone through minimal fact checking before being published.

If Berliner has resigned, it is at least in part due to being hoisted on his own petard, by accusing NPR of bias while publishing a piece that would never have made it through fact-checking at any reputable paper. [/quote]

Inskeep’s piece could be entirely and 100% true and yet NPR still looks very, very bad right now when you combine Berliner’s suspension and resignation with the current behavior and past tweets of the new CEO.

The problem is that NPR can’t have it both ways: it can’t selectively demand rigorous fact-checking, which is what it seems to be doing now. I’m shocked at the ham-handed messaging and handling of the new CEO and don’t see how she restores credibility. [/quote]

What current behavior of the new CEO?[/quote]

The way she handled the Berliner letter has been abysmal. She’s essentially, by her behavior, done more to cement his claims as truth than anything else. It doesn’t matter what Inskeep says: she, by her actions, has endorsed exactly what Berliner wrote. She’s proven him right more than he could have done.

What she should have done is this: state that as America’s public news station, NPR welcomes a diverse group of perspectives. Stated that she is concerned with the allegations raised and is looking into establishing a neutral investigation. Not suspended Berliner as it looks like she is punishing a whistleblower for speaking up. Used facts to prove him wrong, if they exist. Stated online that yes, I’ve made some stupid tweets (because my God are they stupid) but I don’t believe in cancel culture and neither should you so let’s move on (of course, I suspect she does believe in cancel culture so maybe that would not work).

This statement from Maher is rank incompetence at best, and largely just serves to show that Berliner has made some valid points:

https://www.npr.org/sections/npr-extra/2024/04/12/1244456600/from-npr-president-and-ceo-katherine-maher-thoughts-on-our-mission-and-our-work

It does not contain any factual analysis, only opinion. It primarily talks about hurt feelings, as if that should be the guiding journalistic principle. It doesn’t address the substance of Berliner’s claims. It says it is making some changes with respect to process, but doesn’t explain why or what the goals are in any real detail. It’s a bunch of whiny gobbledygook and a badly wasted opportunity. 
[/quote]

PP, do you think Christopher Rufo would call off the dogs and become an NPR listener if she did any of what you suggest?[/quote]

Why does that matter? Why on earth should her goal be to make a listener out of Rufo? She is the CEO. She should be able to stand behind or address tweets that she literally wrote. If she cannot handle her own tweets being surfaced and mocked by someone like Rufo, she should not be CEO. The whole idea that the CEO of a supposedly rigorous public news agency needs to have “dogs” called off is, candidly, insane. If she can’t handle something as milquetoast as her own words being resurfaced, she can’t handle any actually hard editorial process or challenging journalism. [/quote]

She's the CEO. Her job is actually to stay out of the editorial process.[/quote]

Her job is to make sure NPR continues to be well-respected (something at serious risk now), get funding, and drive the organization forward successfully. All we know about her so far is that she’s punished a whistleblower, her feelings get hurt easily, and she can’t handle being mocked for ludicrous tweets she wrote herself. That doesn’t bode well for the organization at all. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics