Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "PARCC monitoring student's social media, wants schools to "punish" them"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Again, you keep trying to disqualify and discredit the people that did participate on the committee. And all of it is an attempt to try and discredit the process and imply it was flawed - and that therefore the end product is flawed. That is fallacious reasoning - and, even so, not even particularly relevant as you have not been able to produce any data or evidence that the end product is flawed. [/quote] The assumption here is that, if the process was flawed, then the end product cannot be anything other than flawed, and therefore it is unnecessary to demonstrate the flaws of the end product. I'm surprised, really. I'd think it would be easier to demonstrate the flaws of the end product -- especially if the flaws are so manifest and so flawed, as the opponents keep saying.[/quote] +1 It demonstrates the bottom-of-the-barrel tactics of someone who is grasping at straws. Given they have no real evidence to support the claims of flaws in the end product, they think that chipping away at the periphery will somehow get them somewhere. But again, it's fallacious. Typical FUD (fear-uncertainty-doubt) sowing tactics.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics