Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "GA Case"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am not sure the defense attorneys actually understand what a conflict of interest is. A conflict is when a member of the prosecution has a family member in the defense. Or if there is a financial relationship between the two parties. Having people on the same side with a financial relationship or personal relationship is not a conflict. This whole sideshow is a sham.[/quote] I am also confused on this. I asked a question 20 pages ago and no one answered. I saw a news commentator who said to prevail on removing her, they need to prove (1) she benefitted financially (which is an issue of fact to decide on credibility of witnesses, which she probably yes, received some benefit; but also (2) that unfairly prejudices the defendant. Even if (1) is a slam dunk, what evidence has there been on (2)? Was the commentator wrong on the elements to be proven? Because it anything, it helps the defendant because it seems that Wade isn't as experienced as other attorneys she could have gotten.[/quote] Watch the video at 17:53. He lays out the conflict of interests in this case. There are several. He lists 6. [/quote] And absolutely none of those meet the legal threshold for a case like this.[/quote] +1 sound and fury signifying nothing [twitter]https://x.com/acyn/status/1763680643014185017?s=46&t=kf1qYlCXQnKgUhJWEIu2vg[/twitter][/quote] In other words, prosecutors and attorneys are not expected to act ethically and morally. [/quote] No one proved that anyone didn’t act ethically or morally.[/quote] LOL. Sure. Ha ha ha ha. All DAs have affairs with people they supervise. And, that is just for starters. [/quote] You say that and yet still no one has proved that anyone didn’t act ethically or morally.[/quote] Good grief. They have admitted to an affair. Do you think it is ethical or moral for a DA to have an affair with a married man she is supervising??????[/quote] He was separated and had been estranged for at least 5-6 years at that point. Who cares? Is it ethical for a married presidential candidate to have sex with a porn star when his wide was home with a newborn and then use campaign funds to illegally buy her silence before the election? Why does Trump get a pass but the single black lady doesn't?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics