Reply to GA Case

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "GA Case"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am not sure the defense attorneys actually understand what a conflict of interest is.

A conflict is when a member of the prosecution has a family member in the defense. Or if there is a financial relationship between the two parties.

Having people on the same side with a financial relationship or personal relationship is not a conflict.

This whole sideshow is a sham.[/quote]

According to Georgia Code, this defines conflict of interest:

Conflict of interest” means an individual has multiple interests and uses his or her official position to exploit, in some way, his or her position for his or her own direct, unique, pecuniary, and personal benefit.

https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2022/title-45/chapter-10/article-2/part-6/section-45-10-90/#:~:text=“Conflict%20of%20interest”%20means%20an,legislative%20branch%20of%20state%20government.

And, the first attorney up - John Merchant pointed out that Fani Willis, as a public employee, is expected to maintain records as to gifts, etc. 
She did not do that.  She said she paid cash, but has no record of it.  
[/quote]

My nephew buys cars with cash a few times per year. Mechanic. Fixes and flips. Where he lives people just want to get on with business. Nobody is writing out receipts. [/quote]

He may have issues if the IRS comes knocking.

Fani Willis is a government employee and as such, should be maintaining impeccable records when it comes to her expenditures and gifts.  
She has failed in that regard.  [/quote]

She probably does. Since there were no gifts here, there was nothing to record or track. The defense, which has the burden here, has not proven anything to the contrary.[/quote]

The trips that Wade paid for appear to be gifts unless she can demonstrate that she indeed paid him back.  She has no proof.  She has no records.  As a government employee, she should.  
[/quote]

The burden is on the defense, not Ms. Willis, to the claim.[/quote]

Yet, as a public employee - she failed to keep records to confirm her claim. [/quote]

What kind of records do you keep for your cash expenditures? How was she supposed to know that right wing investigators would be snooping around her private life years later in a court case?

That is such an unrealistic requirement. Again, the defense has the burden of proof here and they have none. It isn't up to her to help them out.[/quote]

I am not a public employee who hired my affair partner to prosecute a case and paid him nearly $700,000.  
So, your question is irrelevant.  [/quote]

[b]he wasn't an affair partner at the time [/b]and according to first hand testimony of two other witnesses called by the defense, he was her third choice as a hire.[/quote]

At least 2 witnesses refute that statement. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics