Reply to Hearst Playground story in Current

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Speaking of lights, they should install lights for the field at Hearst so it can be used into the evening.[/quote]

That would really piss off the neighborhood.[/quote]

Why?  One one of the 4 sides of the park borders on homes and that side is below grade from the street so the lights would not be noticeable and there is plenty of on-street parking around the school.

There is an acute shortage of field time in DC especially on weeknights so lights here would really serve a need.

Lots of other DPR facilities have lights so if there is a need this one should too.

Having said that you'd really need a turf field if the lights were being installed to facilitate soccer as the extra use would quickly obliterate a grass field.

The main reason the neighbors would object is because they'd lose their illegal dogpark if the field were more intensely used and we know from this 200 page thread that the immediate neighbors think this is their own Gramercy Park and not a public resource.[/quote]

[b]That field is probably among the most intensely used fields in the city. Why isn't walking a dog a legit use?[/b] There is such a thing as light pollution. Mary Cheh is willing to band leaf blowers in the entire city because one constituent complained a noisy neighbor I would think she would appreciate the many concerns about destroying Hearst from hundreds of citizens.  The only reason there is no pool on the field is because corrupt Cheh is tight with the Stoddert soccer crowd, where she was once an official and they said they needed the field.

In fact, there are homes directly on three sides of the park: Quebec on the south, Idaho on the southeast, and Springland Lane on the east.[/quote][/quote]

No it is not one of the most intensely used fields in the city.  The intensely used fields all have turf on them.  I'm 12 years into being a soccer parent in DC with one kid playing travel in his 4th year now and trust me Hearst is not intensely used.  Just in NW DC Palisades, Jelleff and Deal's fields are much more intensely used and if you want to see intense you should spend a Saturday at Carter Barron.

And dogs are not allowed on turf fields in DC at all - not on a leash or off a leash so no dog walking on a DPR field in fact is not only not legit it is actually illegal.

Of course had the neighbors of the park been constructively engaged in this process they probably could have gotten a dog park incorporated into the renovation but they were too busy making a$$es of themselves screaming about prison lights.

And though my youngest only rarely has practice at Hearst when the field is re-done next year if I see someone allowing their dog to run off leash on the new turf I will call the police.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics