Reply to IAC Lacrosse

Forum Index » Lacrosse

Reply to "IAC Lacrosse"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]PVI ?!?!? That's been he narrative for years now. They don't have a problem attracting kids, they have a problem not sucking at lacrosse. Episcopal I know little about except that it is a very expensive and very small all boarding student school. It seems odd to me that they would be out 'offering free rides' to local kids for lacrosse. That isn't he business prep schools are in if 5 of 60 spots a year are unpaid to be tops in one sport. Landon just sit as good today as their historicals have been and they won't be like that any time soon. Several of their top players are seniors and their underclasses has two very gifted star attack players. After that they are a program in the herd. I'd agree costs do matter. STA is really expensive too, over $40K for a day prep and DC ain't Wall Street or Silicon Valley. The preps tha a cheap Jesuits like Zaga do have a sustainable edge since they are half the cost. Casey O'Neil has also pretty much jetted away as the top local coach as well. It is hard to see any IAC program knocking them off for the years to come. [/quote]

You have no idea what you are talking about.  Landon's senior class is very weak, but their junior and soph classes are strong.  They have kids other than Buller and Epstein.

Gonzaga has a terrific 2016 class, but this team will be down next year.  Stating that "hard to see any IAC program knocking them off for the years to come" is ridiculous.  I would agree that would apply to the WCAC, which is far inferior to the IAC.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics