Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "SWS - as an IB School? L-T prospects?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] how is the "history and culture" any different than any other neighborhood school? It never functioned as a standard "neighborhood school" before since only 1/2 the students were below K and not guaranteed neighborhood seats. Even SWS K didn't guarantee neighborhood seats -- only Peabody did. there was never any kind of proximity preference for SWS in its old location. Its boundary included families as far east as Barney Circle and Stadium Armory area via the Cluster DCPS didnt' intend to create another neighborhood school to fight over boundary lines. SWS was intended as a specialized program to compete with charters and complement other DCPS offerings.[/quote] Not true. K retained the Cluster boundary for enrollment priority until SWS landed in a new home. Cluster boundary families got priority for K at Logan Annex, but I'm not sure if that preference was before or after Peabody families who had a one time option to move between Peabody and SWS at the time of the split (both ways -- SWS families were allowed to move to Peabody). FWIW there was more movement from SWS to Peabody than vice versa. Don't know if proximity applied at the Annex, but the Cluster boundary definitely did.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics