Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Tiger Woods reportedly dating Vanessa Trump"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Hoping an attorney can chime in. Tiger takes the breathalyzer and it shows he was NOT drinking. He then refuses a urine test and he is charged with a DUI. My questions: -Was Tiger charged with the DUI because of the refusal? If one refuses, does a judge get involved? -The police statement said Tiger appeared impaired. Would police be wearing body cameras to prove their point? -What happens next? [/quote] Inferences are often drawn against a driver who refuses a breathalyzer, urinalysis or other chemical tests. Under implied consent laws, the act of driving is considered an advance agreement to submit to such tests if there is probable cause for a DUI or DUID arrest. In many jurisdictions, a refusal to provide a sample is not just a procedural hurdle; it can be used directly as evidence in court: Consciousness of Guilt: Prosecutors may argue that a driver refused the test because they were aware of their own intoxication and wanted to avoid providing incriminating evidence. Admissible Evidence: Judges or juries are often permitted to consider a refusal as evidence of impairment during a criminal trial. Heightened Punishment: If later convicted of a DUI, a prior refusal may lead to more severe sentencing or "heightened punishment". [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics