Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "NYT: "The Trouble with Men""
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yes you can have a kid on your own but depriving that kid of a mom or a dad is a selfish decision. [/quote] Something like 25% of kids are being raised without a father. I hope you admonish every dead beat loser who puts a check in the mail instead of being a father. [/quote] I hope you admonish every evil loser who denies her ex husband access to his kids just to spite him.[/quote] Right right. If you were actually a good dad you wouldn’t be “denied access”. Time to face the music, youre the deadbeat we’re talking about NOT settling for.[/quote] Women 100% deny access to good dads just to spite them. [/quote] Wtf. Almost every state is 50/50 custody even if you are an abuser to anyone but the kid. It’s sad that the only way to get some males with kids to parent is via the court system. Guess their (first) family and marriage weren’t worth growing up for. [/quote] What's truly sad is that so many moms who are 100% responsible for whom they choose to procreate with, don't make better choices There wouldn't be any dead beat dads at all if women weren't constantly using irresponsible unprotected sex to fulfill their own emotional needs, with no thought at all as to the suitability of the men they are choosing to procreate with Try as you might to wriggle out of the inevitable conclusion, women are the gatekeepers to their own wombs. If they grant access injudisciously, they are solely responsible for the consequences.[/quote] That’s the point of all the recent articles and discord: women are making better choices and skipping over duds. One problem is there are way more male duds than male non-duds or female duds. [/quote] From the male point of view, just the opposite. There are more female duds than male duds. Female duds: unpleasant to be around, crazy, physically unattractive - and yet nevertheless has an absurd list of demands for what she wants men to be and do. And women wonder why men are increasingly indifferent to them. Astounding lack of self awareness, smh.[/quote] Don’t understand. Can you pls provide some examples of each? Unpleasant to be around, for example: - - Crazy, for example: - - Physically unattractive, for example: - - [/quote] Look in the mirror ho[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics