Reply to NYT: "The Trouble with Men"

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "NYT: "The Trouble with Men""

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote]The kind of completely serious and devoted man who can fulfill your family career and financial aspirations as well as be anywhere close to 50/50 on the kids and household chores is not going to be able to fulfill all those things AND HAVE AN ACTIVE SOCIAL LIFE THAT DOES NOT INVOLVE YOU and it your kids and or both of your extended families.

Oh, I am not looking to have any more kids - my one teen is enough for me. I wouldn't be a match for a guy with young kids, just not interested in doing that. Older kids and teens are welcome. I would love a guy with his own friends and interests, I have my own as well. Not necessarily looking to get married again, just to have a partner to enjoy spending time with.[/quote]

Also, not sure what you mean by financial aspirations - I'm not looking for someone to contribute to my finances, I am good.  However, I don't want to have to financially support someone else.  As long as someone has a reasonable job (my last boyfriend was an investigator at a financial regulatory agency), I'm happy with him work-wise.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics