Reply to 40 yr old Kim Kardashian fails first year legal test

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "40 yr old Kim Kardashian fails first year legal test"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]MPRE is the multistate professional responsibility exam.  It's required in many states to practice, but it is completely separate from passing the bar exam.  MPRE is strictly about legal ethics.  A bar exam is going to test many many points of knowledge and analytical reasoning in torts, criminal law, constitutional law, property, evidence and civil procedure.  Much longer exam with much greater content.[/quote]

She is not going to pass the bar exam.

[/quote]

Maybe not the first time.  The husband of the Japanese ex-princess took 3 or 4 tries before he finally passed.

Kim's got stick-to-it-iveness.  She may pass it.

Also, there are some who go to law school and get their JD but never take the bar.  Since she's never going to be a first year associate at some Biglaw firm, she doesn't actually need to pass the bar.  She has passed her law program. And [b]she knows how to persuade the president, which is an invaluable skill[/b].[/quote]
But she wasn’t able to persuade him because of anything she’s learned about the law, the Constitution, etc. She didn’t persuade him through carefully crafted, clever arguments, air tight logic or brilliant oratory. She was able to persuade him because she’s very famous, comes from a famous family, was married to someone famous, has a lot of fans/followers, is extremely marketable, is attractive, and had not criticized Trump publicly. That’s literally all it took. If Taylor Swift had never indicated that she wouldn’t vote for Trump, never criticized him publicly, she could approach him respectfully, ask for a meeting, and he’d be absolutely thrilled to be photographed with her. She could probably get a small concession from him.

Things like legal arguments and facts don’t persuade him. Kim didn’t need to read the law to get something out of him. All she had to do was share her bright spotlight with him.[/quote]

She knows more about the law now.  It's not about what the president knows or doesn't know about the law, it's about her and what she will know what to ask and why [/quote]
She didn’t learn about these draconian prison sentences for drug mules and the grandma who was serving time on these charges from studying the law; she studied the law because she learned about such injustices. She didn’t need to study the law for years and years to be an advocate for sentencing reform. That’s great if she uses her influence to bring attention to social justice issues, and I wish her good luck if she sits for the bar, but so far, she hasn’t accomplished anything she couldn’t have accomplished without studying the law.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics