Reply to Why is there so much opposition to ending birthright citizenship?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Why is there so much opposition to ending birthright citizenship?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yes stop Citizenship by Birth, starting now.

There are zero reasons for having it this or next century.

Then close the borders.

Then do the deportations, fines for employing illegals, require english at all hospitals, schools and govt buildings, etc. Like most other countries do. [/quote]

Yes and make it illegal for people who aren’t citizens or valid permanent residents to be educated in any of our schools. Or to be allowed to rent apartments. There’s no reason illegals or tourists should be able to rent apartments.[/quote]

This is up in a few states legislatures: No free k-12 education if parents and child are: not documented (no have any docs!), or not a citizen or legal green card holder or legal visa (no phony asylum).  [/quote]

State law cannot overturn Federal law & SCOTUS decisions - Doe v Plyer - stating that children cannot be denied a free public education on the basis of their immigration status. https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/sites/default/files/research/public_education_for_immigrant_students_understanding_plyer_v_doe.pdf

“ In June 1982, the Supreme Court issued Plyler v. Doe, a landmark decision holding that states cannot
constitutionally deny students a free public education on account of their immigration status. By a 5-4 vote,
the Court found that any resources which might be saved from excluding undocumented children from public
schools were far outweighed by the harms imposed on society at large from denying them an education.
For more than thirty years, Plyler has ensured equal access to education for children regardless of status, but
anti-immigrant sentiment continues to threaten that right. States and localities have passed measures and
adopted unofficial policies that violate the spirit —if not the letter —of the Court’s decision. For example, in
2011 the state of Alabama enacted a law requiring school administrators to determine the immigration status
of newly enrolling students, which in turn resulted in markedly higher rates of absenteeism for Latino school
children and caused much fear and confusion in schools. Supporters of the Alabama law wanted to challenge
Plyler itself, claiming the Court implied that its ruling could change if sufficient evidence established that the
enrollment of undocumented children harmed the overall quality of education, but that challenge was
blocked by the Courts.”[/quote]

Just like roe, pyler needs to go, send this up to the supreme Court to overturn. We need to look at all the crazy left supreme Court rulings of the 70s and early 80s before the normal Reagan supreme Court appointees were put in [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics