Reply to Debate Moderator Fact Checks

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Debate Moderator Fact Checks"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Trump had every opportunity to win the debate with substance. He failed, which is completely on-brand for him.[/quote]

Where was VP Harris' substance?  She couldn't even answer the very first question (do you believe Americans are better off than they were 4 years ago?) without pivoting quickly into her own alleged upbringing an what she planned to do.  The real-time tracking of the debate showed independent voters tracking more with Republicans than Democrats.  Likewise, independent voters who watched the debate expecting to learn more about VP Harris' policy positions and future plans came away with little more than they had before the debate.

Former President Trump lost his cool when baited by VP Harris.  He shouldn't have, but doing so didn't do her any favors with independent voters.  Yet at the same time, he made numerous key points that resonated with independent voters.  Can VP Harris really say the same?  The press doesn't seem to think so after interviewing independent voters, who mostly seemed to say that they wanted to "see the fine print" of her plans.  By the same token, independent voters seem to remember how much better off economically they were under Former President Trump, a feeling that is difficult to dislodge without a clear path from VP Harris that she can do the same.  The reason?  She has been VP for over 3.5 years and many of the promised benefits of the legislation she voted for haven't come to pass, so promises of future prosperity fell flat.  Things have gotten worse, not better, for most Americans.[/quote]
Actually, KH nanswered the Moderators questions. Unlike Trump 
[/quote]

No she didn’t.  First question out of the gate was are Americans better off than four years ago. Her answer?  She has a “passion for small business.” Wut?  She literally has never worked a day in the private sector in her adult life.  She’s never met a regulation she didn’t like. Did the moderators press here for a yes or no?  Of course not. [/quote]

She had a summer job when she was in college, so I guess it depends on how you define “adult”.  From my perspective, I’m impressed by her career-long dedication to public service— given that she’s running for the ultimate public service job.  I prefer that — by far — to someone who was given money and jobs by his daddy yet actually managed to lose money while stiffing his contractors and others that he owed. The reality show gig doesn’t make his resume look any better.  It’s wild that so many people who claimed that government should be run like a business voted for someone with a string of failed businesses.

As to “passions” — you don’t have to work for a small business to have a passion for supporting them.  I’m sure you can come up with your own analogies, but I don’t have to be an artist to have a passion for supporting the arts; I don’t have to be a chef to have a passion for good food; I don’t have to be a pilot or a tour guide to have a passion for travel; I don’t have to write books to have a passion for reading them.  You get the idea.

Your boy’s “passions” are better left undescribed, but cozying up to dictators, cheating on his wives, hanging out with people like Epstein and Roy Cohn, and fomenting hate aren’t admirable interests for a US President.

[/quote]

PP, you are a rock star![/quote]

Kamala, who knew?  A gun toting, McDonalds eating, border wall loving, pro fracking gal![/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics