Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "MoCo “Attainable Housing” plan and property values"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]MOCO homeowners impacted will be smart to create covenants (like yesterday) before the council approves it. And yes the council will approve it, and smugly condemn neighborhoods who have covenants.[/quote] Was there a covenant adopted yesterday, or was it the conversation yesterday about covenants to which you were referring? Agree that this is sailing towards passage, and likely without meaningful change from the Planning report or effective guardrails. The rich detached SFH neighborhoods are the ones far more likely to have or establish the suggested covenants. The Council may verbally condemn them, but the impact of their action will be condemning the less wealthy detached SFH neighborhoods to bear the brunt of the additional density, and those are, typically, already less well served by public facilities (e.g , school capacity issues). Those areas are far [i]less[/i] likely to have protective covenants (or the protection of municipal zoning authority, like Rockville or Gaithersburg, or historic designation, like wealthy parts of Takoma Park), and they are far more concentrated to the east/in the Silver Spring area. Again, bravo County Council/Planning for setting up even greater economic disparity! :roll:[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics