Reply to Bombshell: NYT story suggests Alito is the leaker of Dobbs decision

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Bombshell: NYT story suggests Alito is the leaker of Dobbs decision "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Just doing my daily check in to see if any actual evidence has emerged as to who the leaker is.  No?  Didn't think so.  I'll check back tomorrow![/quote]
Did you do your daily check in? It seems like you might have some opportunities to be fed evidence you will enthusiastically ignore.  :lol:

[twitter]https://twitter.com/MondaireJones/status/1598348561040740352?cxt=HHwWgMC4gYjjvK4sAAAA[/twitter][/quote]

I will be waiting eagerly for any hard evidence to be presented.  Thanks for the heads up![/quote]

I’m curious what evidence would be acceptable to you. There’s probably no recording and probably nothing in writing, so what would be hard proof other than a confession? [/quote]
DP. There’s nothing at all. The party that chants “lock her up” and believes in Q’a adrenochrome harvesting demands proof and by that they mean that even if emails among Alito, Ginni and Clarence surfaced and they all admitted it under oath, pp would still not believe it.

And for that troubled soul who will get his dander up no, I don’t believe those three conspired. I’m just pointing out how Repos will believe anything their party shovels at them, proof free.[/quote]

That is true. Look at all that is happening with Trump. Even "proof" will not be good enough. They will just stick their fingers in their ears and go about their way. Proving stuff to randos is to keep non Repubs busy. In reality, they never cared.
[/quote]

I’m the pp who asked. That’s what I feel like too. I was just curious if any of them would answer. I mean, even if they gave an answer I know the goalposts would be moved when the time comes. [/quote]

Except that at least two people have responded to your question - you seem to be conveniently ignoring those answers while you and your pal concoct bizarre flights of fancy to suit your narrative.  Present some actual proof.  That’s not too much to ask, and you know it.  If an outlandish claim was being made about one of the liberal justices, you’d say exactly the same thing.  Talk about moving goalposts.   :roll: [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics