Reply to Common Sense Gun Laws

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Common Sense Gun Laws"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Folks: "Gun Control" is a dead term. It died at Sandy Hook.  The new term is[b] Massacre Reduction.[/b]   Pass it on.[/quote]

Yea, seems like a good way to refocus our efforts on the root cause of mental health crisis.

Great idea!!![/quote]

?  "Mental health crisis" is a Republican talking point.  See also: "Criminals."

The crisis is [b]widespread retail access to assault weapons[/b].

To that point, there's some sweet deals here if you're in the market:

https://www.sportsmansoutdoorsuperstore.com/category.cfm/sportsman/ar-15-rifles

But, yes, the new term (replacing soggy old, failed "gun control") is[b] Massacre Reduction. [/b][/quote]

“massacre reduction” is a democrat talking point. See also “common sense gun safety laws”

At least have the honesty to call it what you actually want: “gun bans and gun confiscation”

Just be honest about it. Let people decide on the real goal, rather than hiding it in deliberately non-specific euphemisms. [/quote]

Idiot,

[b]Massacre Reduction[/b] is not a Democratic talking point, but it should be.  See[/quote]

I’m noticing a prevailing trend here: gun grabbers and hoplophobes like you always seem to begin their retort with an insult.

Why is that? Why are you incapable of discussion without insulting others? What do you attribute that to? A lack of self control?

[/quote]

Here's another prevailing trend: Mass shooters killing people.  Didja hear the latest?  :D   19 children were slaughtered last week, most of them by having their face blown off.  [/quote]

Non-sequitur.

Can you please try to answer the question?[/quote]

Why does anyone need an AR 15?   Why do these bloody slaughters happen mostly in the USA again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again?
[/quote]

There's lots of reasons to own one, but you will likely dismiss them.[/quote]

+1. I use one for terminating chipmunks and wild boar, both of which wreak havoc on our farmland. The latter also tastes awesome. The other big thing that they can be used for is as [b]an insurance policy against a tyrannical government, i.e. as the founding fathers intended. [/b]If just 5% of a 300 million population country owns weaponry, it makes going door to door and sending  people the the gulag very costly for a government that gets out of hand. It’s hard to imagine a situation where the US government is going door to door and sending people to the gulag, but who thought it would happen in Germany at the time. [/quote]

The founding fathers DID NOT intend for you to use an AR 15 to do anything, because at the time of the constitution, [b]AR 15s DID NOT EXIST![/b]. There is absolutely NO RIGHT IN THE CONSTITUTION TO OWNING AN AR 15- those items did not even exist at the time.  So yes, you may be entitled to a musket, which existed at the time, but certainly not a semi automatic weapon.
[/quote]

Repeating firearms existed more than 50 years before the constitution. I'm pretty certain that the founders understood technological innovation, "To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries." Article I Section 8 | Clause 8[/quote]

Another proud voice from the[b] Pro-Massacre Community.[/b]  Welcome![/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics