Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "If Jesus wasn’t a real historical figure, where did Christian theology come from? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote] Historical reconstruction is never absolutely certain, and in the case of Jesus it is sometimes highly uncertain. [/quote] Yup. “Never absolutely certain.” He [i]most likely[/i] existed. [/quote] Jesus did more than just exist. He said and did a great many things that most historians are reasonably certain we can know about today. ....[b] A hundred and fifty years ago a fairly well respected scholar named Bruno Bauer maintained that the historical Jesus never existed. Anyone who says that today - in the academic world at least - gets grouped with the skinheads who say there was no Holocaust and the scientific holdouts who want to believe the world is flat. [/b] M A Powell, Trinity Lutheran Seminary [/quote] ? What does this have to do with anything, you're arguing with yourself. I second the other pp's question: "why?"[/quote] <a href="https://ibb.co/m0JXv74"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/8bMdzV9/BEE21-C07-6-F4-D-4-CB6-B01-C-0-BE2-D5-F8-AB12.jpg" ></a>[/quote] Discussing the lack of hard evidence isn’t denying that he existed. It’s just saying we don’t have hard evidence. More ad hominems. [/quote] So you think the academics and historians quoted here don’t have sufficient evidence? Why not? [/quote] Ok. What is the hard evidence? Any independent, contemporary sources? [/quote] You are automatically discarding all the evidence seen and considered by every historians and scholar why?[b] Because you are the atheist version of the Nazi skinhead that denies the holocaust and the atheist version of a flat earther and the atheist version of an anti-vaxxer[/b]. [/quote] basically this is all you got -- the name calling. And not a shred of evidence has been mentioned on this thread to discard, so I don't know what you're talking about.[/quote] You haven’t read these scholars and their writings? So you think I personally have a dossier of evidence I myself unearthed in a dusty library and have been keeping a secret? Refute those historians and scholars, not me. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics