Reply to Andy Ngo, notorious racial agitator, caught in Portland protest

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Andy Ngo, notorious racial agitator, caught in Portland protest "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]:lol:  DP.  Let’s look at the Jacobin, shall we?

LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/jacobin/[/quote]

You left out this part: “Overall, we rate Jacobin Magazine, Left Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the Democratic Socialist Left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and a clean fact check record.”

Whereas, of Post Millennial, they say: “Overall, we rate The Post Millennial Right Biased based on story selection that favors the right and Mixed in reporting due to publishing unsubstantiated claims and having several failed fact checks.”

I’m not the PP who linked to Jacobin and I don’t read it because Democratic Socialists largely annoy me. But if you think you’ve got a real winning argument here, you don’t. Ngo is provocateur. If he is representative of your “media figures,” you best head back into the barn and think some because you are backing the wrong horse. [/quote]

You are totally off the deep end.  I am the PP who posted the Jacobin link.  And I never made any claims that it was unbiased.

Meanwhile here you are making exaggerated and totally false claims that it was touted as unbiased and in the hours I've been away from the board I see you have been busy making post after post after post hysterically trying to take down Jacobin (you seem a bit unhinged in that), when I haven't even mentioned it once since my first post.

But where you DID fail is in that you have done exactly jack shit where it comes to actually addressing or debunking the actual content of the article.

I guess when you can't go after the substance you just try and shoot the messenger.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics