Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Latin replication pulled from PCSB agenda"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm 10:03. I apologize. 42% of students in charters are at-risk in 2018. 70% are economically disadvantaged. https://www.dcpcsb.org/data/evaluating-student-enrollment/student-enrollment[/quote] But some charters have hardly any, and at some (Latin) the few at risk kids are not doing well. I would think with a mostly very easy student body, nice enough building, parent fundraising, getting most kids in middle school AND taking the easy road by not letting anyone in after 9th, Latin could do a little better than its current unimpressive stats. Operating a by right system is much harder. The schools have to plan as best they can for uncertain numbers and midyear arrivals. It is not something most charters are willing to do. Back when Dunbar was being operated by a contractor it was no better. The charter sector has no special sauce other than pushing out the hard kids and refusing to do a lot of the hardest work.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
