Reply to well no wonder Amy Chua defended Brett Kavanugh so emphatically

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "well no wonder Amy Chua defended Brett Kavanugh so emphatically"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]How, exactly, do you suggest investigating a 35 yr. old allegation? Anyone who might have some information has been invited (repeatedly) to come forward. No one has. No one can corroborate this allegation. In the meantime, Kavanaugh has had six FBI investigations, all of which turned up nothing. No one is trying to "tear down" Blasey Ford, but you simply can't argue with the FACT that she had no evidence or witnesses to back up her claim.

You are so f-ing clueless it’s painful. How on earth would those background checks uncover this incident? [/quote]

Those were likely much more intense background checks than most people get.  Not only that, but, don't you remember that there was an additional investigation last Fall?  The FBI interviewed all of Blasey Ford's "witnesses."  None of them remembered anything about the said party.  Not even her very good friend.

[/quote]

Still wouldn’t have come up in a background check.

It wasn’t a true investigation. Which is what the GOP wants to avoid. 
[/quote]

The GOP was not going to fall for the delay tactic that the left was employing with their continued investigations when there was no EVIDENCE.  None.  
Similar to the whole Russia investigation.  Lasted two years yet we know the premise of the investigation was a ruse concocted by the DNC and Hillary campaign.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics