Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Root cause of issues at MOCO schools?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]My oldest and youngest is almost a decade apart in age. I will say MCPS has seriously slid downhill from where it was 10 years ago. My oldest received a decent education at a W school. We are now considering private for my youngest. The privates as far as class options, class size, and positivity in the school climate just seemed like a happier place to go to school when we toured them. Curriculum has a higher standard and they focus more on developing basic foundations with proven curriculums vs. the nightmare 2.0 debacle. There is also no need for wasted school days on PARCC instruction and assessments.[/quote] How much time did your oldest spend on MSA instruction and assessments?[/quote] Not as much as PARCC and the MSA was paper and pencil. With PARCC, the computers sometimes crash and loose the child's answers. [/quote] Really? My kid spent way more time on the MSAs than my younger kid spent on the PARCCs. Especially MSA prep.[/quote] Schools might have different prep plans. Our middle school was insane about the amount of class time preparing for PARCC.[/quote] I must add, there was a principal change between MSA and PARCC transition so that could also be the issue. The last principal could have been more focussed on trying to bump up scores for tests vs. actual student engagement and learning than the first. I do think teaching to the test vs. teaching students to learn and retain knowledge long past the test is part of the problem with MCPS. The non-existent curriculum is the other. MCPS doesn't know what pathway to choose and students have paid the price. For my kids, I saw issues early on with 2.0 so I bought textbooks and workbooks of proven curriculums to fill in gaps at home. Even in our W school cluster, s[b]o many families didn't realize the need to do so that my children easily outperformed them in school[/b]. [/quote] I was working in bethesda in 2009-2016. The first couple years everyone was happy, honky dorey about MCPS and such "good schools." Then Common Core started and the C2.0 worksheets, portals, curricula on the fly. My male and female co-workers with kids age 6-13 changed their tune fast and many went to catholic schools or started hardcore supplementing or getting tutors. Many had kids on either side of the "new curriculum" and were pissed off. The families that graduated class of 2018 or earlier were silently happy and relieved. [/quote] My 2018 Grad was hit with 2.0 for high school math. The teachers kept to their old textbooks and old lesson plans. For students who xid not supplement, they were not taught material that MCPS held them accountable for. Every year, the curriculum wasn't being written fast enough for teachers to adnusr. [/quote] I thought 2.0 was a K-8 curriculum. Is it really being used in high school too?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics