Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "What do you expect from APS staff (option/neighborhood) on 4/30?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Okay, I couldn't resist digging into it now. From what I'm seeing, and assuming IB refers to ATS (because ATS otherwise isn't listed), [b]it looks like Tara, Gladis and Lisa have all had Nottingham marked for ATS from the start.[/b] Maybe the IB label means they are contemplating rebranding ATS as an IB elementary school as part of the move? It looks like they've also been in agreement all along that Campbell should stay EL and immersion should be at Carlin Springs. They originally thought the other immersion program should be at ASFS, but I guess they realized that wasn't going to be workable. So ATS was potentially on the table to become neighborhood?[/quote] It is hard to accept anything they say after seeing that. So, so dishonest.[/quote] Could someone please post the full link? I'm not seeing the -1.[/quote] https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Data-Table-04122018-Web.xlsx[/quote] Wow. In all fairness, it doesn't mean they've had it marked from the start. There aren't dates on when they made their assessments, and I'm going to assume they did so after having reviewed all of the data. Big mistake posting this.[/quote] What it means that even though the staff has saying publicly that they're not considering which program should go where at this stage, they're only looking for optimal sites, they had in fact come up with their preferred arrangement of all of the programs within the sites before they released the first round of analysis. They lied about their process, which makes all of their other public statements suspect as well. It certainly make sense now why they overlooked their errors on Nottingham, they'd already decided they wanted it for ATS/IB and if the first pass got them the result they wanted, they weren't going to scrutinize it too closely.[/quote] This process is a total sham. [u][b]The last modified timestamp on the Excel Spreadsheet is 4/12/2018 3:12pm[/b][/u]. Lisa, Zachary Larnard, Tara and Gladis had decided on April 12th that Nottingham would become IB/ATS. Why do we even have an engage process? APS Sucks. [/quote] Does APS have an IG? Would the SB even care or are they in on these shenanigans. What is the process for...? [/quote] The link seems to be broken ([b]File Not Found[/b]). Any idea what happened to it? https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Data-Table-04122018-Web.xlsx [/quote] The staff realized people had found the document and pulled it off the server. Here is a screen shot of the key tab: [img]https://preview.ibb.co/kJQvdn/Walk_Rank.png[/img][/quote] And just to clarify, this tab was created *before* the first draft presentation, not after. They already knew their target result when they did the first round.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics