Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Kim Cattrall SJP feud"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think Kim Cattrall is getting a bad rap here. Everyone wants to focus on what she did and not why. Kim Cattrall wanted to do a SATC movie when the series ended. The movie was delayed. She asked for more money. It was leaked to the press that she was "demanding and a diva" and she was the reason for the holdup on the movie. She deserved to be paid exactly what SJP was paid for SATC. Full stop. Fast forward to the second movie; rinse and repeat. They try to publicly malign her in the press because she wants more money; money that she deserves. Third movie... Kim Cattrall says "I don't want to do a third movie." Now all of a sudden it is in the press that she "has all these demands. she wants money. they have to fund her projects, etc..." She goes on Piers Morgan to refute that report and state that her only demand was that "she didn't want to do a third movie." Why take the time to tarnish her reputation by leaking stories in the press? Why not just make the third movie and move on without Kim Cattrall? Why continue to ask her to do the SATC movies if she wants more money and if she's a diva? SJP et al are fully aware that Kim Cattrall [b]IS[/b] SATC; without her the franchise isn't as successful and the movies do not generate as much money, etc... So instead of risking failure, they publicly shame her, put future opportunities for her in jeopardy, and try to turn everyone against her. And based on the stories of Queen B SJP's behavior on set during the series, all of this is believable. Kim Cattrall's IG post was basically a nail in the SATC coffin and a big FU to SJP so she will go away and leave her alone for good. At 61, she's tired of giving phucks about what people think; especially when she knows that SJP was a bitch to her and is probably behind all of the bad press that she is getting. #TeamKim [/quote] You are my soulmate. I absolutely agree with your every word. This isn't some petty high school feud. This is about SJP leaking stories to the press and intentionally vilifying Cattrall, blaming her for a third movie not being made (won't somebody think of the fans!). SJP is a passive-aggressive phony who knows full well that her anti-Kim campaign is likely to damage Cattrall's career and livelihood. Aside from the movies being horrible, they can't make another one without Samantha. No one wants to see a 50-something year old Carrie bouncing around like Betsy Johnson. It's tired, but SJP doesn't care, and she has no range. She wants the paycheck, and Kim has repeatedly prevented SJP from cashing in. If someone I had worked with for years dragged my name through the mud and threatened my career, I probably would have lost my cool, too. If SJP cared, she would have picked up the phone. Cattrall is in shock and in mourning; I'll give her a pass. [/quote] Meh. You and the PP seem to be lionizing Kim Cattrall. How do you even know SJP leaked stories to the press? Samantha was never my favorite character, and it's utterly ridiculous that you're making her out to be everyone's favorite. Clearly, she was yours. But speak for yourself. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics