Reply to Renting but not occupying for DCPS in-boundary residency purposes?

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Renting but not occupying for DCPS in-boundary residency purposes?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It’s fraud and if you get caught, you’ll be fined and forced to pay each years tuition for each child...[/quote]

You have no idea what you’re talking about. Go away. Tuition only applies to non-DC residents. DCPS changed it policy last year and now students can continue at their school (and feeder path too) even if they move OOB.[b] And it’s clear DCPS did this in response to IB Parents who incessantly complained that OOB got to keep their spot even if they move houses[/b] (so long as they stay in the District). I think the complaint was intended to argue why OOB practice need to be eliminated. But since that will never go away DC responded, “OK, nobody has to leave.” Big backfire. [/quote]

They changed it to protect children who are housing insecure -- bouncing from mom to dad to grandma's etc.

[/quote]

Perhaps if the parents kept out of prison, the kids wouldn’t be so “housing insecure.”[/quote]

I teach at a ward 8 school and three of my students are considered housing insecure and none of their parents are in jail. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics